<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TeamPatent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.teampatent.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.teampatent.com</link>
	<description>Patent Drafting Service - Write • Share • Collaborate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:28:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenID for &#8220;single-sign-on&#8221; convenience by Greg</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/03/30/clickpass-harvests-address-books/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=16#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Yup. It looks like Clickpass is a harvester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. It looks like Clickpass is a harvester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenID for &#8220;single-sign-on&#8221; convenience by rokahn</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/03/30/clickpass-harvests-address-books/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>rokahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=16#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think many users have noticed their address book is being harvested without any privacy policy; which is why Clickpass has been so successful.  Clickpass is able to get a lot of investment for effectively harvesting social web information from many users.  Less greedy services (I&#039;ve been very happy so far with RPX), will grow more slowly and get edged out in the competition, unless consumer awareness grows through postings like yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think many users have noticed their address book is being harvested without any privacy policy; which is why Clickpass has been so successful.  Clickpass is able to get a lot of investment for effectively harvesting social web information from many users.  Less greedy services (I&#8217;ve been very happy so far with RPX), will grow more slowly and get edged out in the competition, unless consumer awareness grows through postings like yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenID for &#8220;single-sign-on&#8221; convenience by Lenni</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/03/30/clickpass-harvests-address-books/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=16#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I tried to sign up to Hacker News, which uses Clickpass, today and noticed the strange request to access my Google address book. This seems very unnecessary and greedy. Why do they want *all* my addresses?

This blog post seems to be the only one I could find that picked up on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to sign up to Hacker News, which uses Clickpass, today and noticed the strange request to access my Google address book. This seems very unnecessary and greedy. Why do they want *all* my addresses?</p>
<p>This blog post seems to be the only one I could find that picked up on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Import Published Patents to Identify Errors by Bruce Burdick</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/07/13/import-published-patents-to-identify-errors/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Burdick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=44#comment-35</guid>
		<description>TeamPatent online program should be very useful for locating defects (or absence of defects) in the reference numbering in existing patents.  I have tried it one some of mine and some tird party patents to see how they fare under validation checking by TeamPatent.  This will be useful in licensing and litigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeamPatent online program should be very useful for locating defects (or absence of defects) in the reference numbering in existing patents.  I have tried it one some of mine and some tird party patents to see how they fare under validation checking by TeamPatent.  This will be useful in licensing and litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Kappos proposes Patent Quality Index (PQI) by Import Published Patents to Identify Errors &#171; TeamPatent</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/07/13/david-kappos-proposes-patent-quality-index-pqi/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Import Published Patents to Identify Errors &#171; TeamPatent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=45#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments (RSS)       &#171; David Kappos proposes Patent Quality Index&#160;(PQI) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments (RSS)       &laquo; David Kappos proposes Patent Quality Index&nbsp;(PQI) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PIUG Conference 2009 by brabin</title>
		<link>http://blog.teampatent.com/2009/05/07/piug-conference-2009/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>brabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teampatent.com/?p=30#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I used Freepatentsonline for a long time.  It&#039;s not the only free option though.  If you are not familiar with Patent Lens, you should check it out:
http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/patentlens/patentlens.html

Not only free, but a one-stop-shop for all databases, access to pdfs, and some nifty search and analysis tools as well.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Freepatentsonline for a long time.  It&#8217;s not the only free option though.  If you are not familiar with Patent Lens, you should check it out:<br />
<a href="http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/patentlens/patentlens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/patentlens/patentlens.html</a></p>
<p>Not only free, but a one-stop-shop for all databases, access to pdfs, and some nifty search and analysis tools as well.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
